|
|
|
|
Co-operative Driving on the Automated
Highway
|
|
 |
|
The highway of the future will
utilise intelligent infrastructure
which interacts with the vehicles and people
using it.
|
|
|
|
|
Highways of the future will utilise intelligent
infrastructure which interacts with the
vehicles and people using it.
Cooperative driving and greater automation
of the highway (Cooperative Vehicle-Highway
Systems - CVHS) will deliver predictable
/ reliable journey times and greater safety
in adverse weather conditions. However,
public opinion may be resistant to futuristic
concepts of automation. Complete reassurance
on safety, reliability, practicality and
sustainability in all circumstances will
be required.
A backbone of inter-regional automated
highway lanes will be established, segregated
for freight and car traffic. The lanes will
provide safe, fast and predictable journey
times for those willing to pay the price.
CVHS will bring other innovations which
help focus on a favoured traffic mix, such
as freight convoys. CVHS will make it easier
to minimise the disruptive effect of road
works (eg diversions) and maintenance programmes
(eg access to lanes) and to increase the
life of the highway (eg avoid rutting).
|
|
| Case for Network Operator
Action |
|
- Co-operative driving and greater automation
of the highway (Cooperative Vehicle-Highway
Systems - CVHS) have the potential for significant
safety and capacity improvements and could help
focus on a favoured traffic mix, such as freight
convoys.
- Making better use of existing highway space
without further land take is more publicly /
politically acceptable than new build.
- CVHS may provide new options for the network
operator to improve the level of service to
the end user: predictable / reliable journey
times and greater safety in adverse weather
conditions.
- CVHS may make it easier to handle / accommodate
road works (e.g. diversions) / maintenance programmes
(e.g. access to lanes) / increased life of highway
(e.g. avoid rutting).
- Cooperative vehicle-highway systems can only
be implemented with the active involvement of
the infrastructure owner and operator.
|
|
|
- Japan has a developed programme of research
with a focus on safety, (Smart Way and
Smart Cruise), with deployment planned
to begin in 2003.
- The USA, and in particular California,
have planned demonstrations in 2003 and
are furthering research into CVHS supporting
systems for delivery of both increased
safety and congestion relief.
- The European Commission are actively
supporting automated driving programmes,
as well as individual country initiatives.
Plans are developing for a major project
in the 6th Framework Programme.
- The Netherlands have a well developed
Automated Vehicle Guidance programme within
their Roads to the Future
initiative and France are embarking on
a long term deployment strategy, La
Route Automatisse of driver assistance
for rural, freight, commuting and inter-city
scenarios.
- The development and deployment of CVHS
is dependent on the cooperation and collaboration
of the Private and Public Sectors. The
Private Sector, with their consumer based
service provision requires the support
of the public sector to enable the effective
provision of services and to ensure a
wider vision and satisfaction of societal
needs.
|
|
|
|
- Secure major safety and highway capacity
benefits through promotion of technologies
for co-operative driving and greater automation
of the highway.
- Develop a politically acceptable deployment
strategy for deploying these technologies.
|
|
|
|
- Carry out a comprehensive evaluation
of the available co-operative driving
and automated highway concepts, including
a political risk assessment and identification
of potential show-stoppers:
- Social and political issues: perceived
acceptance / public acceptability (e.g.
only top of the market cars will have
necessary systems to begin with; possible
concerns from fleet owners)
- Liability and health and safety issues
in the event of failure
- Standards (both vehicle and driver
performance)
- Hazard and operability assessment.
- Performance in severe and exceptional
operating conditions and/or an unfavourable
traffic mix.
- Maintenance arrangements and fail safe
options for periods of inoperability
- Levels of reliability in adverse weather
conditions (ie the system cant stop
and start - it needs to be consistent
and reliable)
Effect of foreign vehicles, rogue drivers
and inconsistent driving patterns (ie
hazards from the public)
Enforcement and policing issues
- Specialist freight requirements (e.g.
abnormal loads)
- Interface with non-automated highways
and routes: entry/exit / interchange
Track examples from other countries (e.g.
California, Holland, Japan, France, etc)
- Identify suitable test / demonstration
sites (UK or abroad) for trials, safety
audits / failsafe considerations and user
acceptance work
- Identify EU funding opportunities and
develop joint projects (trials and demonstrations)
with neighbouring countries (e.g. Netherlands,
France)
- Create a national stakeholder forum
(the UK Automated Highway Forum) and encourage
UK participation in the international
stakeholder forums
Business case development: Cost benefit
analysis / economic evaluation
- Clarify demarcation of Network Operator(s)
and Vehicle Developer roles and stimulate
appropriate vehicle development
- Focus on stepping stones and transitional
steps towards co-operative driving and
greater automation (e.g. engineering technology
base such as dynamic lane management).
- Assess the target traffic mix; develop
an appropriate infrastructure design,
and user and vehicle standards (e.g. the
motorway fit driver / vehicle)
- Develop the legal framework, enforcement
methods and system of regulation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|